A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family home. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, where by improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of your depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Times described, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up covered intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further more submissions on no matter whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to organizing law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a spouse and children house in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean all through a storm, do not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your problem that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded through waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline along with the symbolic character of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see Irish Times article about René Collier as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to establish if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with one another extended after the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre with the dispute stands partially crafted, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.